Alpaka Aero Pack (16L) vs Alpaka Traverse Backpack (38L)
Alpaka Aero Pack (16L) ($109) vs Alpaka Traverse Backpack (38L) ($269) — side-by-side specs, weight, pros and cons to help you pick the right backpack.
Spec-by-spec
| Spec | Alpaka Aero Pack (16L) | Alpaka Traverse Backpack (38L) |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $109 | $269 |
| Weight | 600g | 2100g |
| Capacity | 16L | — |
| Fits | a 16" MacBook Pro, water bottle, camera, essentials | — |
| Material | X-Pac VX21 / Axoflux | — |
| Carry | Backpack | — |
| Weight | 600g | 2100g (74.08 oz, Alpaka product page) |
Pros & Cons
Alpaka Aero Pack (16L)
- 16L yet fits a 16" laptop
- Lightweight, packable
- Camera + bottle room
- Minimalist organization
- Mid-tier capacity
Alpaka Traverse Backpack (38L)
- 38L capacity
- clamshell access
- organized compartments
- 2100g empty is heavy for everyday carry
- $269 is premium pricing
Alpaka Aero Pack (16L) is the better value at $109. Both are part of our curated backpack index — tap through to check current pricing.
More Backpack comparisons
Alpaka Flight Sling vs Alpaka Elements Tote ProAlpaka Flight Sling vs Alpaka Zip ProAlpaka Flight Sling vs Alpaka Elements Tech Case Mini (X-Pac RX36)Alpaka Flight Sling vs Alpaka Metro Sling V2 — Horse EditionAlpaka Flight Sling vs Alpaka Momentum SlingAlpaka Flight Sling vs Alpaka Momentum Backpack