Alpaka Go Sling Nano vs Alpaka Traverse Backpack (38L)
Alpaka Go Sling Nano ($59) vs Alpaka Traverse Backpack (38L) ($269) — side-by-side specs, weight, pros and cons to help you pick the right sling.
Spec-by-spec
| Spec | Alpaka Go Sling Nano | Alpaka Traverse Backpack (38L) |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $59 | $269 |
| Weight | 260g | 2100g |
| Capacity | 1.6L | — |
| Fits | an iPhone & compact camera | — |
| Material | Axoflux 600D | — |
| Carry | Sling | — |
| Weight | 260g | 2100g (74.08 oz, Alpaka product page) |
Pros & Cons
Alpaka Go Sling Nano
- 1.6L barely-there carry
- Fits phone + compact camera
- Lightweight
- Tiny capacity
- Phone-and-camera only
Alpaka Traverse Backpack (38L)
- 38L capacity
- clamshell access
- organized compartments
- 2100g empty is heavy for everyday carry
- $269 is premium pricing
Alpaka Go Sling Nano is the better value at $59. Both are part of our curated sling index — tap through to check current pricing.
More Sling comparisons
Alpaka Flight Sling vs Alpaka Elements Tote ProAlpaka Flight Sling vs Alpaka Zip ProAlpaka Flight Sling vs Alpaka Elements Tech Case Mini (X-Pac RX36)Alpaka Flight Sling vs Alpaka Metro Sling V2 — Horse EditionAlpaka Flight Sling vs Alpaka Momentum SlingAlpaka Flight Sling vs Alpaka Momentum Backpack