Home / Wireless Charger / Comparison
Anker MagGo Wireless Charger vs Sharge 140W PD 3.1 Charger (140W, 3 Ports)
Anker MagGo Wireless Charger ($110) vs Sharge 140W PD 3.1 Charger (140W, 3 Ports) ($99) — side-by-side specs, weight, pros and cons to help you pick the right wireless charger.
Spec-by-spec
| Spec | Anker MagGo Wireless Charger | Sharge 140W PD 3.1 Charger (140W, 3 Ports) |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $110 | $99 |
| Weight | 280g | 255g |
| iPhone | MagSafe Qi2 15W | — |
| Apple Watch | Dedicated magnetic puck | — |
| AirPods | 5W Qi pad | — |
| Fold | Yes — collapses flat for travel | — |
| Cert | Qi2 certified | — |
| Weight | 280g | 255g (9.0oz) |
| Output | — | 140W |
Pros & Cons
Anker MagGo Wireless Charger
- Charges iPhone + Watch + AirPods simultaneously
- Qi2 delivers full 15W MagSafe speed
- Folds flat for travel and desk storage
- Single USB-C cable powers whole unit
- No Apple Tax — third-party Qi2 at lower cost
- Apple ecosystem only — no Android optimization
- 280g heavier than a cable solution
- $110 premium for wireless convenience
Sharge 140W PD 3.1 Charger (140W, 3 Ports)
- 140W output
- 2 colors
- One more thing to carry
Sharge 140W PD 3.1 Charger (140W, 3 Ports) is the better value at $99. Both are part of our curated wireless charger index — tap through to check current pricing.
More Wireless Charger comparisons
Anker Nano 65W GaN vs Anker 240W USB-C CableAnker Nano 65W GaN vs Anker Nano II 65W ChargerAnker Nano 65W GaN vs Anker MagGo Wireless ChargerAnker Nano 65W GaN vs Anker Zolo Power Bank (10K, 30W)Anker 240W USB-C Cable vs Anker Nano II 65W ChargerAnker 240W USB-C Cable vs Anker MagGo Wireless Charger