Casio A168W vs Casio F-91W
Casio A168W ($25) vs Casio F-91W ($20) — side-by-side specs, weight, pros and cons to help you pick the right quartz.
Spec-by-spec
| Spec | Casio A168W | Casio F-91W |
|---|
| Price | $25 | $20 |
| Weight | 21g | 21g |
| Movement | Quartz | Quartz |
| Battery | 3 years CR2016 | — |
| Case | Stainless steel | — |
| WR | 30m | — |
| Backlight | Electroluminescent | — |
| Display | Digital | — |
| Water Resistance | — | Splash |
| Battery Life | — | 7 years |
| Weight | — | 21g |
Pros & Cons
Casio A168W
- $25 no-regret purchase
- 3-year battery
- Stainless construction
- Iconic retro aesthetic
- Works in any outfit
- 30m WR only
- Digital not for traditionalists
- No chrono or alarms
Casio F-91W
- Literally $20
- Seven-year battery
- Instantly legible
- Not water-resistant
- Plastic strap cracks
Casio F-91W is the better value at $20. If weight matters most, Casio A168W carries lighter at 21g. Both are part of our curated quartz index — tap through to check current pricing.