Casio A168W vs Casio G-SHOCK GA-2100 CasiOak
Casio A168W ($25) vs Casio G-SHOCK GA-2100 CasiOak ($110) — side-by-side specs, weight, pros and cons to help you pick the right quartz.
Spec-by-spec
| Spec | Casio A168W | Casio G-SHOCK GA-2100 CasiOak |
|---|
| Price | $25 | $110 |
| Weight | 21g | 51g |
| Movement | Quartz | Quartz |
| Battery | 3 years CR2016 | — |
| Case | Stainless steel | — |
| WR | 30m | — |
| Backlight | Electroluminescent | — |
| Display | Digital | — |
| Water Resistance | — | 200m |
| Battery Life | — | 3 years |
| Case Material | — | Carbon core |
Pros & Cons
Casio A168W
- $25 no-regret purchase
- 3-year battery
- Stainless construction
- Iconic retro aesthetic
- Works in any outfit
- 30m WR only
- Digital not for traditionalists
- No chrono or alarms
Casio G-SHOCK GA-2100 CasiOak
- Slim for G-SHOCK
- Carbon core guard
- Great looks
- No rechargeable
- Resin strap creaks
Casio A168W is the better value at $25. Both are part of our curated quartz index — tap through to check current pricing.