Home / Flashlight / Comparison

Fenix HM65R-T V2.0 vs Fenix UC35 V2.0

Fenix HM65R-T V2.0 ($110) vs Fenix UC35 V2.0 ($89.95) — side-by-side specs, weight, pros and cons to help you pick the right flashlight.

Fenix HM65R-T V2.0
Fenix
HM65R-T V2.0
$110
Check Price →
Fenix UC35 V2.0
Fenix
UC35 V2.0
$89.95
Check Price →
Spec-by-spec
SpecFenix HM65R-T V2.0Fenix UC35 V2.0
Price$110$89.95
Weight129g89g
Max Output1600 lumens—
Runtime300h low—
ChargingUSB-C—
Weight129g89g (Fenix published)
Material—Aluminum, hard-anodized
Output—1000lm max
Battery—1x 18650 (included) or 2x CR123A
Weight basis—Without battery
Pros & Cons

Fenix HM65R-T V2.0

  • Dual beam
  • USB-C
  • Long runtime
  • Front-heavy
  • Proprietary strap

Fenix UC35 V2.0

  • Body weighs 89 g
  • Holster and lanyard included
  • Falls back to CR123A
  • Weight excludes the battery
  • Micro-USB charging port
  • Flat-top 18650s will not work
Fenix UC35 V2.0 is the better value at $89.95. Both are part of our curated flashlight index — tap through to check current pricing.
More Flashlight comparisons
Olight i3T EOS vs Olight Baton 3 Pro MaxOlight i3T EOS vs Olight S1R Baton IIOlight i3T EOS vs Olight Warrior Mini 3Olight i3T EOS vs Olight Baton 4Olight i3T EOS vs Olight S2R Baton IIOlight i3T EOS vs Olight Arkfeld Pro