Home / 3-in-1 Charging Station / Comparison
KUXIU D5 Qi2.2 25W 3-in-1 Wireless Charging Station vs Sharge 140W PD 3.1 Charger (140W, 3 Ports)
KUXIU D5 Qi2.2 25W 3-in-1 Wireless Charging Station ($60) vs Sharge 140W PD 3.1 Charger (140W, 3 Ports) ($99) — side-by-side specs, weight, pros and cons to help you pick the right 3-in-1 charging station.
Spec-by-spec
| Spec | KUXIU D5 Qi2.2 25W 3-in-1 Wireless Charging Station | Sharge 140W PD 3.1 Charger (140W, 3 Ports) |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $60 | $99 |
| Weight | 352g | 255g |
| Charging | Qi2.2 25W phone, 5W watch, 5W earbuds | — |
| Devices | iPhone + Apple Watch + AirPods | — |
| Weight | 352g (12.4oz) | 255g (9.0oz) |
| Dimensions | 74 x 75 x 107mm | — |
| Display | TFT status screen with clock | — |
| Cooling | Active fan | — |
| Output | — | 140W |
Pros & Cons
KUXIU D5 Qi2.2 25W 3-in-1 Wireless Charging Station
- Charges phone, watch and earbuds at once
- Hidden motorized watch charger
- Live power and status screen
- Active cooling
- 352g, a desk piece
- Needs a 35W+ PD charger
- Apple Watch charging is 5W
Sharge 140W PD 3.1 Charger (140W, 3 Ports)
- 140W output
- 2 colors
- One more thing to carry
KUXIU D5 Qi2.2 25W 3-in-1 Wireless Charging Station is the better value at $60. If weight matters most, Sharge 140W PD 3.1 Charger (140W, 3 Ports) carries lighter at 255g. Both are part of our curated 3-in-1 charging station index — tap through to check current pricing.
More 3-in-1 Charging Station comparisons
Anker Nano 65W GaN vs Anker 240W USB-C CableAnker Nano 65W GaN vs Anker Nano II 65W ChargerAnker Nano 65W GaN vs Anker MagGo Wireless ChargerAnker Nano 65W GaN vs Anker Zolo Power Bank (10K, 30W)Anker 240W USB-C Cable vs Anker Nano II 65W ChargerAnker 240W USB-C Cable vs Anker MagGo Wireless Charger