Home / Wireless Charger / Comparison
Nomad Base One Max vs Sharge 140W PD 3.1 Charger (140W, 3 Ports)
Nomad Base One Max ($130) vs Sharge 140W PD 3.1 Charger (140W, 3 Ports) ($99) — side-by-side specs, weight, pros and cons to help you pick the right wireless charger.
Spec-by-spec
| Spec | Nomad Base One Max | Sharge 140W PD 3.1 Charger (140W, 3 Ports) |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $130 | $99 |
| Weight | 250g | 255g |
| Charge | 15W iPhone + 5W AirPods + 5W Watch | — |
| Surface | Machined aluminum | — |
| Cable | 1.5m woven USB-C | — |
| WR | None (desk use) | — |
| Weight | 250g | 255g (9.0oz) |
| Compatibility | iPhone 12+ MagSafe | — |
| Output | — | 140W |
Pros & Cons
Nomad Base One Max
- 15W MagSafe full iPhone speed
- Simultaneous three-device charge
- Machined aluminum premium build
- Woven cable lasts longer
- Nomad aesthetic unmatched
- $130 for a charger
- Desk-only use
- Apple Watch charger attached (not removable)
Sharge 140W PD 3.1 Charger (140W, 3 Ports)
- 140W output
- 2 colors
- One more thing to carry
Sharge 140W PD 3.1 Charger (140W, 3 Ports) is the better value at $99. If weight matters most, Nomad Base One Max carries lighter at 250g. Both are part of our curated wireless charger index — tap through to check current pricing.
More Wireless Charger comparisons
Anker Nano 65W GaN vs Anker 240W USB-C CableAnker Nano 65W GaN vs Anker Nano II 65W ChargerAnker Nano 65W GaN vs Anker MagGo Wireless ChargerAnker Nano 65W GaN vs Anker Zolo Power Bank (10K, 30W)Anker 240W USB-C Cable vs Anker Nano II 65W ChargerAnker 240W USB-C Cable vs Anker MagGo Wireless Charger